Does Bob Dylan Stand the Test of Time?

Bob Dylan has sagely admonished fans and critics (is there a difference between the two, really?) not to compare him to what he was 20 or 30 or 40 or more years ago. He would prefer that we put him alongside the 2012 versions of his peers as opposed to the remarkable Dylan in Manchester, England, in 1966 or the exuberant Dylan on Tour ’74 or the resourceful Dylan of Rolling Thunder Revue renown.

It’s a fair point. Does Dylan stand the test of time in his concerts? His recent album “Tempest” certainly passes the audition. It’s a spooky, evocative album featuring fine singing and playing — with the customary terrific Dylan lyrics sprinkled throughout. It’s a very strong piece of work.

Then there is Dylan today on stage. I don’t know what to make of him. I’m glad that he is still out there, night after night, from Saskatoon to Grand Rapids to Boston. He seems to enjoy playing for 90 minutes a night to an audience of wide-eyed veterans and newcomers alike. Dylan symbolizes much that is good and decent about the American Dream. That’s why I wanted to write my book, “Forget About Today.” As usual, Dylan raises as many doubts as reassurances.

During the show that I saw at the Hollywood Bowl a few weeks ago, on a pleasant Friday night in southern California (Oct. 26), I was occasionally bewildered as I tried to figure out what song he was playing — to the point of guessing excitedly (and, alas, incorrectly) to my friend Julie that this was a version of a song from “Tempest!”

Over all, it was an enjoyable, if uninspiring, show. For any other performer, it probably would have been OK. But not for this man., For Dylan, you see, I have big expectations (which he would say, no doubt, is my own damned fault). Still, I hope and expect to be moved because Dylan is so talented, innovative and singular.

But at the Hollywood Bowl, if one Dylan couplet summed up what took place on stage, it would have been: “I used to care/But things have changed.”

Despite Dylan’s warning not to dip into the past, I’m still going to invoke a comparison of Dylan from not so long ago: a decade back, to be precise, on Nov. 13, 2002. I saw Dylan and his terrific back-up band perform at Madison Square Garden. Dylan had won the Best Song Oscar the year before for “Things Have Changed” and the praiseworthy reviews for “Love and Theft” echoed. He was on a creative and commercial high. Everyone loved Bob Dylan,  and it showed that night at the Garden. It was a triumphant homecoming for New York’s own Bobby Dylan.

The show exploded during the third song, “Tombstone Blues,” which was a nice throwback to the wild Sixties. From there, Dylan morphed into a rollicking (the only word that applies) rendition of “You Ain’t Goin’ Nowhere” and Madison Square Garden was transformed into the Grand Ole Opry in a flash. I could be wrong but I think Dylan debuted the lovable tune at that show or, at the very least, on this tour.

Next up was a rocking version of “Things Have Changed,” as Dylan leaned forward and put a lot of theatrics and feeling into the vocal. It was terrific. He gave us the impression that he meant every word. It was nice to see because Dylan can be a notoriously up and down performer. On this night, he looked completely locked in.

In the sixth slot was the real treat of the evening, a startling and fantastic performance of the Stones’ hit single “Brown Sugar.” The guitarists would have put Keith Richards and Ron Wood to shame that night. The band, in fact, played so hard and fast that Dylan had to scramble just to keep up with his fellow musicians on stage. They forced with power, precision and style. I could tell they were having a ball, too. I don’t think Dylan has dared to play this tune again after the conclusion of this tour. It’s understandable. He probably couldn’t expect to top the 2002 version.

Dylan closed the show with the extraordinary (for him) gesture of actually speaking to the audience and relating his affection for George Harrison, who had died the year before. Dylan closed the show by playing a heartfelt, lovely version of “Something,” with an innovative arrangement employing strings. He was spot-on, underscoring what an excellent vocalist he is.

And fast-forward my back pages to Oct. 26, 2012 when I saw Dylan and his mates play at the Hollywood Bowl. Sorry, but the current show didn’t match up in any way to what I witnessed a decade ago. It was unfortunate. Yes, some folks did walkout, as reviewers have written along the tour since Dylan began this leg early in October. Mostly, I saw, youngish people showed disrespect for the artist by talking (loudly) through the songs and then rushing for the exits. I don’t condemn anyone for walking out. If they pay the money, they have the right.

Dylan has the obligation to keep them in their seats, too. I worry about the quality of his singing voice. I wish he had played songs that night from “Tempest.” I know about Dylan’s mystique but it still wouldn’t kill the man to address the audience once in a while and acknowledge that we matter to him (even if we really d 12on’t).

I believe that Dylan appreciates the devotion of his audience.He must feel a surge of pride at the applause, to think that he can still make people happy after all these years. It’s one thing to make people smile — but it’s another to move them. I want Dylan to move me.

JONFRIEDMAN.NET QUESTION OF THE DAY: This is for the folks who have seen Dylan in concert in the last year: Did you feel moved by his performance?

Please feel free to comment, criticize and complain. But as always becivil or be gone.

  • MaryZ

    Please don’t over analyze a Dylan concert. You look foolish and trite. Dylan clearly is mailing it in, pursued by his own demons. I think your blog has really just become typing.I’d give it a rest. Don’t become a meme for irrelevance on the web but that is perilously close. Instead of calling the existing Dylan literature “pretentious” as you did to CBS, look in the mirror. Really.

  • RobinS

    You’re just a parasite, Friedman. I know pop-up ads that have better contents than you.

    • Kolumbia

      Took the words right out of my mouth. This verbal vomit he calls a blog is just here to hawk his crap book

      • jonfriedman

        Did it take you a long time to figure that out? Congratulations.

  • Peter de Rijcke

    Don’t judge too soon. And listen to the tapes. Much of the 2002-2004 shows (when BD played keyboards) did’nt have highlights like Brown Sugar and Something. Besides, did he sing those two songs that good? No. It’s too early to judge about the recent tour. I have heard wonderful versions of Tangled up in Blue, Ramona and in several shows Early Roman Kings. Listen to St. Paul as an example. And that’s not the only thrilling show. To me, counting the highs and lows this tour it’s pretty the same as other ecent years.

  • mark

    What good would it do for Dylan to talk to the audience? The only reason you want this, I suspect, is that so you can say, “I was there when Dylan finally thanked the audience!” There is absolutely no artistic reason for it. It wouldn’t make a concert better or worse. He’s not Bruce Springsteen. He’s not going to tell a story to you. Really, Springsteen telling the same story before “Tenth Avenue Freeze Out” every concert of a tour is disingenuous. It’s an act (not that I have a problem with it–Springsteen is a showman). What’s the point of wishing Dylan would address the audience, then? You would gain literally nothing from it, no? As for setlists, I’ve already commented on that before (most people who attend concerts are not diehard Dylan fans), but beyond that, none of us have any clue why songs are played or not. It could simply be that Dylan isn’t comfortable singing certain songs anymore–either he feels no connection to them, he isn’t satisfied with the way the band has played them in rehearsal, or he feels his voice can’t handle them. None of us actually know the inner workings of anything here. As much as everybody would love to hear “Black Diamond Bay” or something, if he doesn’t feel like he can perform it, what’s the point? To satisfy the wants of a vocal minority and the random Bobcats who simply want it on the setlist so they can see it on a setlist? If you want to listen to “Black Diamond Bay,” put on ‘Desire.’

    • jonfriedman

      I think it would show a healthy respect for the audience if Dylan acknowledged it by saying a few words. But that’s me.

  • Andi Pasti

    his shows are getting better and better every year since 2002, at least they are not going worse and if you don’t like it just leave them alone

  • motelzero

    One thing I would note. I have read over the years hundreds of locall news articles where the writer indicates that it was difficult to figure out what song he was playing at various points during the show. I can honestly say that with the exception of certain arrangements (say Watching the River Flow vs. Leopard Skin Pillbox Hat where the intro can be very similar) I’ve never had the experience of sitting through a performance and not knowing what song he was playing. Sure, the opening notes may not give it away but typically, the song becomes clear right before or during the opening lyrics. I really don’t think true fans have any problems knowing what songs he is playing.

  • bettecorsan

    As I recall, Bob Dylan singing “Brown Sugar” in Seattle 2002 was awarded the best live song of the year by Rolling Stone magazine. I was there, and he also sang some Warren Zevon songs that I could not identify. It´s only when he throws in a random cover that I can´t identify a song, or when he does something unusual like playing the mystery blues instrumental at the recent Chicago show I attended. If you´ve ever been up close and seen the buckets of sweat that pour off that man as he plays at the piano, it would humble you to count yourself lucky to witness such dedication to his art. What he does, says, or plays is not going to shake the world, but if you can see his soul in each of those things, you´re going to come away with a touch of the miracle of Bob Dylan.

    • jonfriedman

      What do I care what Rolling Stone thinks? (And when was the last time that RS ever criticized Dylan for anything — think about it). RS has published an interview with Dylan in 2006, 2009 and this year. It seems like each party has a reason to keep the other one happy — Dylan gets good press in a popular magazine and RS gets an exclusive interview). Dylan got big coverage in three consecutive issues this year — good for Tempest sales, too.

  • Santos

    Well Jon, your memories hardly qualify as critical history and your constant flogging of Dylan is somewhere between peevish and hopelessly lame. content with value is key, content for content sake doesn’t make you deep, only needy and pathetic. This won’t help sell your book.

  • Mick

    I’ve seen Dylan 52 times since ’75 and I took my son to see him twice in ’10 so my job is done. He’s done the same show since ’04 (from my experience) and it’s old. I’ve seen some great shows but not since…’97-8. For someone who has this reinventing image, he’s been boring for at least a decade live, expecially since he went to keyboards. Change the band, change the joke that he’s reinventing the songs, and give it a new approach, er, new hat. Or not.

  • JLo

    Listen, Bob Dylan is not going to live forever. He is past his prime. His voice is shot. His last record was not all that great, no matter what the bobheads are saying. However, I salute the man for all the great things he has done, and I hope he can squeeze out another great song or two, or maybe a book or a radio show before he leaves this world full of sorrow and pain.

  • Robert Clark

    You should of been at the concert when Dylan said that Obama was going to win a landslide. Then you would say it was the best Dylan concert you ever seen. Having seen Dylan over two hundred times and five times on this tour, I would have to say seeing Bob Dylan play “Blowing in the wind” on a grand piano pretty fucking special, don’t you think! Maybe in ten years when you look back on it you will agree with me.

  • Sasha

    Mom always said if you nothing to sat then be quiet. You, Mr Friedman, have nothing to say. Dylan isn’t your pet poodle.

    • jonfriedman

      I think you’re misquoting Mom. She probably didn’t say “sat” in that instance. I used to have a pet poodle. How did you guess?

  • http://www.facebook.com/burt.shulman Burt Shulman

    I saw him with my two daughters at the Barclay’s Center on Wednesday, a mile or so from our house in Brooklyn. I’m 55, and have been a huge fan for over 40 years. He plays (as always) in part for himself, in part for / with his band, and in part for his audience. At 71, the dude’s energy and focus continue to amaze. I’ve seen him five times, at long intervals: in ’75 with Rolling Thunder (Niagara Falls Convention Center); in ’78 at Brendan Byrne Arena; in the ’90′s at Madison Square Garden with Tom Petty; in 2007 or ’08 at the Jones Beach Theater; and this past Wednesday. In some ways, this last time was the best. In ’75 I was in awe of him (and his retinue – Joni, Joan, McGuinn, I think Neil Young?) and he was magical. But this time he was inventing as I listened — improvising in his singing and on the piano and taking the band with him. What amazes me is that as his physical skills change, he continues to adapt his song interpretations, and in adapting he continues to “make them new” (thank you Ezra Pound). I was most moved by Visions of Johanna, for me as great a song as anyone has written. If I didn’t know the words so well I think I would have loved the sound, but perhaps would not have been so moved. But the fact is that I do know the words, and maybe that’s part of what he counts on – and the way his cracking, croaking 71 year old voice phrased them deepened the impact. When he was writing back in ’65-’66 (and at times still does today), he drove himself to address fundamental matters about the human condition. When he cries out near the end of the song “…while my conscience explodes,” it’s a naked cry, and if we open to it, it can sound the depths of our own hearts. His anguished confession can awaken our own aching conscience — making our own anguished confession possible, at least inwardly — or maybe his confession becomes ours. The song dignifies our lives by taking common human experience so seriously. The otherwise mundane coughing of old heating pipes, flickering lights in factory loft spaces, a transistor radio are rendered with such accuracy and, yes, love that they resonate with a sort of revelation. The singer pretends to be on mocking personal terms with “the night” but he’s really mocking himself and his pretensions. We’re in that loft with him, it’s maybe 3 am and he begins by sketching for us the great beauty of the ordinary. But he’s also struggling with a terrible loneliness, and “stranded” in the very same place that we’re all stranded – our mysterious human lives – which seems to drive him to question whether there can be such a thing as “salvation” or “infinity”. He hasn’t given up on looking for meaning, though, and as he sits in his dark loft and imagines his way through what seems to be a fundamental reckoning with his own flawed soul, through his generosity of expression, he manages to make his soul a proxy for our own. The power of this song runs so much deeper than what can be articulated along the surface of the words; he’s a suffering person, his suffering somehow soothes our own, dignifying our own encounters with aching consciences and longings. Hearing him perform that song on Wednesday took me into all of those places in a new way that had nothing at all to do with nostalgia. The experience was heart-level and immediate. At 71 he’s found yet another sort of energy and command – and retains his magnetic presence – and he prods and pushes his band to wonderful new places. You feel him working his musical intuition and intelligence, probing for freshness — working first to surprise himself, second his band, and only third his audience. But he doesn’t forget his audience — he throws us plenty of gifts (harmonica riffs, those transcendent songs, a window into his living creative process). In a way, I think every Dylan performance has become a rehearsal — and I’d bet that every rehearsal has become a performance. He retains the power to shock, excite, hypnotize, exhilarate, and unquestionably to disappoint. But art is so much about trial and error, so yes, buyer beware: I know there are nights when he comes up empty and can’t find the elusive thread (I recall feeling that way back at Brendan Byrne). On the other hand, on nights like last Wednesday, if you’re willing to listen very closely (and I think he’s earned that from us) he remains a transcendent artist who can enrich the spirit and teach us things (and I suspect teach himself) that are just beyond the reach of language (even his own). So please don’t question his commitment, or issue foolish judgments — no artist alive radiates more of a sense of being called to his art than Bob Dylan, 50 years after his first record. If you can’t hear him anymore, stop going to his concerts — but don’t tell yourself that because you can’t hear it, whatever he’s doing now is worthless – don’t con yourself into thinking that you alone know the score, the rest of us (including Bob) are fools, and you have the right to tell Bob Dylan when it’s time to quit. Parts of his earliest audiences arrogated that right to themselves back in ’61; the folk purists did it again in ’64; the rock purists in ’67; the rock critics in ’70, and ’78, and ’79, and on and on and on. He’ll always — always — be ahead of us, even when he makes lousy music, because he’s always learning. We’re dealing with a level of genius that he himself doesn’t seem to understand, and can’t really control, but thankfully is committed to. He’ll always be capable of blowing our minds again — I don’t care if he’s 95 and can hardly whisper. Whatever he does now is a gift, and the only thing that’s certain is that the gifts will stop coming if he stops trying. You may hate Tempest, but for me most of those songs are yet another set of fresh, strange wonders. The dogs will bark, but you gotta roll on, Bob, roll on!